Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #502, comment 2
 Timestamp:
 6 Sep 2019, 04:19:11 (5 years ago)
Legend:
 Unmodified
 Added
 Removed
 Modified

Ticket #502, comment 2
initial v1 3 3 The next question then would be: 4 4 5 since when `y >= ( 3 << nScale )`, `32 >> ( ( y << 1 ) >> nScale )`, i.e. `wT[x]`, is equal to 0, there seems no need in Eq (8257) on `refT[x][y]` to explicitly include the condition check of `( y < ( 3 << nScale ) )`, as `mainRef[dX[ x ][ y ]]*wT[x]` would be equal to 0 in this caseanyway.5 since when `y >= ( 3 << nScale )`, `32 >> ( ( y << 1 ) >> nScale )`, i.e. `wT[x]`, is equal to 0, there seems no need in Eq (8257) on `refT[x][y]` to explicitly include the condition check of `( y < ( 3 << nScale ) )`, as `mainRef[dX[ x ][ y ]]*wT[x]` would be equal to 0 anyway. 6 6 7 7 So, should we remove the `( y < ( 3 << nScale ) ?` and `( x < ( 3 << nScale ) ?` condition check from Eq (8257) and Eq (8262), respectively?