Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #502, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
6 Sep 2019, 04:19:11 (5 years ago)
Author:
huayg
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #502, comment 2

    initial v1  
    33The next question then would be:
    44
    5 since when `y >= ( 3 << nScale )`, `32 >> ( ( y << 1 ) >> nScale )`, i.e. `wT[x]`, is equal to 0, there seems no need in Eq (8-257) on `refT[x][y]` to explicitly include the condition check of `( y < ( 3 << nScale ) )`, as `mainRef[dX[ x ][ y ]]*wT[x]` would be equal to 0 in this case anyway.
     5since when `y >= ( 3 << nScale )`, `32 >> ( ( y << 1 ) >> nScale )`, i.e. `wT[x]`, is equal to 0, there seems no need in Eq (8-257) on `refT[x][y]` to explicitly include the condition check of `( y < ( 3 << nScale ) )`, as `mainRef[dX[ x ][ y ]]*wT[x]` would be equal to 0 anyway.
    66
    77So, should we remove the `( y < ( 3 << nScale ) ?` and `( x < ( 3 << nScale ) ?` condition check from Eq (8-257) and Eq (8-262), respectively?