id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,priority,milestone,component,version,resolution,keywords,cc 624,Issue with conditions to derive trTypeHor and trTypeVer,vdrugeon,,"In 8.7.4.1 General, the following conditions seem strange, because the if conditions and the otherwise that follows use completely different syntax elements and variables: ""if implicitMtsEnabled is equal to 1, the following applies: – If IntraSubPartitionsSplitType is not equal to ISP_NO_SPLIT or sps_explicit_mts_intra_enabled_flag is equal to 0 and CuPredMode[ 0 ][ xTbY ][ yTbY ] is equal to MODE_INTRA, trTypeHor and trTypeVer are derived as follows: trTypeHor = ( nTbW >= 4 && nTbW <= 16 ) ? 1 : 0 (8 960) trTypeVer = ( nTbH >= 4 && nTbH <= 16 ) ? 1 : 0 (8 961) – Otherwise (cu_sbt_flag is equal to 1), trTypeHor and trTypeVer are specified in Table 8 15 depending on cu_sbt_horizontal_flag and cu_sbt_pos_flag."" Please check! In case it is intended (i.e. (cu_sbt_flag equal to 1) is equivalent to !(IntraSubPartitionsSplitType is not equal to ISP_NO_SPLIT or sps_explicit_mts_intra_enabled_flag is equal to 0 and CuPredMode[ 0 ][ xTbY ][ yTbY ] is equal to MODE_INTRA) ), a note explaining why that is so would be helpful (because it really does not seem obvious). ",defect,closed,minor,,spec,,fixed,,ksuehring bbross XiangLi fbossen jvet@…