Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #691, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
14 Nov 2019, 19:00:32 (9 months ago)
Author:
yjchang
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #691, comment 6

    v2 v3  
    33However, I disagree the solution you provided, which will add a new feature to the current design to allow some PHs to totally disable triangle merge mode even if the regular merge list is enough (the number of merging candidates is larger than or equal to 2). Your design would cause performance loss, and no one is gonna use this feature.
    44
    5 Back to the issue we are discussing, why are you not addressing this from the beginning, e.g., PPS. Several 1-line simple solutions can address this issue without adding any unnecessary features for nothing. One example is adding a conformance to disallow pps_max_num_merge_cand_minus_max_num_triangle_cand_plus1 to be larger than 0 if pps_six_minus_max_num_merge_cand_plus1 is 0.
     5Back to the issue we are discussing, why are you not addressing this from the beginning, e.g. PPS. Several 1-line simple solutions can address this issue without adding any unnecessary features for nothing. One example is adding a conformance to disallow pps_max_num_merge_cand_minus_max_num_triangle_cand_plus1 to be larger than 0 if pps_six_minus_max_num_merge_cand_plus1 is 0.