Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #756, comment 1


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11 Dec 2019, 17:32:32 (5 years ago)
Author:
pierrick.bouvier
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #756, comment 1

    initial v1  
    99Bug is found in section 4) (line 849).
    1010
    11 The latest candidate to be added is not initialized (because of incrementation before return condition). It has value (0, 0) (which is ok) but it's refIdx is still invalid (-1), when we expect (MAX_NUM_REF), as it is the case for other ones.
     11The latest candidate to be added is not initialized (because of incrementation before return condition). It has value (0, 0) (which is ok) but its refIdx is still invalid (-1), when we expect (MAX_NUM_REF), as it is the case for other ones.
    1212
    1313After that, IBC derivation may occur, until the historical candidates must be updated with selected block vector. In this case, and if the block vector used has a bad refIdx, we will have an incorrect historical candidates list.