id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
769	Not matched names between pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value in syntax table/semantics and pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset in eq.(1124)	tsukuba.takeshi		"In WD (JVET-P0041), pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value is defined in PPS as below:

'''pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value''' specifies the offset to the luma quantization parameter Qp′Y used for deriving Qp′CbCr. The value of '''pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value''' shall be in the range of −12 to +12, inclusive. When ChromaArrayType is equal to 0 or sps_joint_cbcr_enabled_flag is equal to 0, '''pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value''' is not used in the decoding process and decoders shall ignore its value. When pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_present_flag is equal to 0, '''pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value''' is not present and is inferred to be equal to 0.

On the other hand, pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset is used in eq.(1124) in sec.8.7.1 as below:

Qp′CbCr = Clip3( −QpBdOffset, 63, qPCbCr + '''pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset''' + 
	slice_joint_cbcr_qp_offset +CuQpOffsetCbCr ) + QpBdOffset	(1124)


For minimum change, pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset should be replaced with pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value.
Or,  
pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset_value in syntax table and semantics should be replced with pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset."	enhancement	closed	trivial		spec		fixed		ksuehring bbross XiangLi fbossen jvet@…