Custom query (1557 matches)
Results (25 - 27 of 1557)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#547 | duplicate | Uncorrect pruning in derivation of spatial merging candidate | antoine.robert | |
Description |
In 8.5.2.3 Derivation process for spatial merging candidates, the pruning is:
But JVET-L0093 reduces it to:
The corresponding lines of the spec should be removed as, for example with candidate A0:
|
|||
#595 | duplicate | Possible unclarity for the half sample interpolation filter index hpelIfIdx of some merge candidates | vdrugeon | |
Description |
As far as I understand from the specification text in 8.5.2.2 Derivation process for luma motion vectors for merge mode, a merge candidate consists in the following information: refIdxL0, refIdxL1, predFlagL0, predFlagL1, mvL0, mvL1, hpelIfIdx and bcwIdx. But it seems that the half sample interpolation filter index hpelIfIdx is never set for Hmvp candidates. According to 8.5.2.16 Updating process for the history-based motion vector predictor candidate list, a candidate in the HMVP list of candidates is defined as: "The MVP candidate hMvpCand consists of the luma motion vectors mvL0 and mvL1, the reference indices refIdxL0 and refIdxL1, the prediction list utilization flags predFlagL0 and predFlagL1, and the bi-prediction weight index bcwIdx." There is no information about the half sample interpolation filter index. Please check! |
|||
#675 | duplicate | Typo in partition_constraint_override_flag should be coded. | Spaluri | |
Description |
partition_constraint_override_flag in the picture header is currently signalled using ue(v). It should be changed to u(1). |