Opened 4 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

#1197 closed defect (fixed)

Order of operations in Eq 251

Reported by: bheng Owned by:
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: spec Version: VVC D10 vA
Keywords: Cc: ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@…

Description

I believe Eq 251 will yield an unintended result due to the order of operations of the "x ? y : z" operator.

inSize = ( 2 * boundarySize ) − ( mipSizeId = = 2 ) ? 1 : 0

Probably an extra parenthesis is needed.

inSize = ( 2 * boundarySize ) − (( mipSizeId = = 2 ) ? 1 : 0)

Change history (1)

comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by jlchen

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Really good catch! This will be fixed as suggested in vE release.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.