Opened 4 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

#1210 closed defect (fixed)

Editorial issue in 8.5.2.9

Reported by: chhuanb Owned by:
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: spec Version:
Keywords: Cc: ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@…

Description

It looks that in subclause 8.5.2.9, step 3 and step 4 should be merged into one bullet.

Current spec:

  1. If both availableFlagLXA and availableFlagLXB are equal to 1 and mvLXA is not equal to mvLXB, availableFlagLXCol is set equal to 0.
  2. Otherwise, the following applies:

Suggest:

  1. If both availableFlagLXA and availableFlagLXB are equal to 1 and mvLXA is not equal to mvLXB, availableFlagLXCol is set equal to 0. Otherwise, the following applies:

Change history (3)

comment:1 follow-up: Changed 4 years ago by jlchen

Thanks for the suggestion. How do you think merging them as follows:

  1. The availability flag availableFlagLXCol and the temporal motion vector predictor mvLXCol are derived as follows:

– If both availableFlagLXA and availableFlagLXB are equal to 1 and mvLXA is not equal to mvLXB, availableFlagLXCol is set equal to 0.

– Otherwise, the following applies:

......

comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 4 years ago by chhuanb

Replying to jlchen:

Thanks for the suggestion. How do you think merging them as follows:

  1. The availability flag availableFlagLXCol and the temporal motion vector predictor mvLXCol are derived as follows:

– If both availableFlagLXA and availableFlagLXB are equal to 1 and mvLXA is not equal to mvLXB, availableFlagLXCol is set equal to 0.

– Otherwise, the following applies:

......

The changes look ok to me.

comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by jlchen

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

The changes will be included in JVET-S2001-vE release.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.