Opened 4 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

#1280 closed defect (fixed)

Subclause number missing in

Reported by: iperroux Owned by:
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: spec Version: VVC D10 vE
Keywords: Cc: ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@…


In, the number of the subclause is missing in the following sentence:

If sbBdofFlag is equal to TRUE, the bi-directional optical flow sample prediction process as specified in subclause (?) is invoked...

(?) should be replaced by

Change history (1)

comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by jlchen

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Thanks for reporting. Seems already fixed in S2001-vG release.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.