Opened 6 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#337 closed defect (fixed)
Cross component prediction tool in VTM but not described in spec
Reported by: | jonathang | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | VTM | Version: | VTM-5.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ksuehring, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@… |
Description (last modified by ksuehring)
In VTM 5.0 within CABACReader::transform_unit, the following code may result in the decoding of a CCP flag, and then a CCP alpha value
if( TU::hasCrossCompPredInfo( tu, compID ) ) { cross_comp_pred( tu, compID ); } void CABACReader::cross_comp_pred( TransformUnit& tu, ComponentID compID ) { signed char alpha = 0; unsigned ctxBase = ( compID == COMPONENT_Cr ? 5 : 0 ); unsigned symbol = m_BinDecoder.decodeBin( Ctx::CrossCompPred(ctxBase) ); if( symbol ) { // Cross-component prediction alpha is non-zero. symbol = m_BinDecoder.decodeBin( Ctx::CrossCompPred(ctxBase+1) ); if( symbol ) { // alpha is 2 (symbol=1), 4(symbol=2) or 8(symbol=3). // Read up to two more bits symbol += unary_max_symbol( Ctx::CrossCompPred(ctxBase+2), Ctx::CrossCompPred(ctxBase+3), 2 ); } alpha = ( 1 << symbol ); if( m_BinDecoder.decodeBin( Ctx::CrossCompPred(ctxBase+4) ) ) { alpha = -alpha; } } tu.compAlpha[compID] = alpha; }
In the current spec there are no syntax elements for CCP. Given the CCLM intra prediction mode and the joint chroma residual coding, is CCP to be removed?
Change history (2)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by ksuehring
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by jonathang
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Seems resolved by https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de/jvet/VVCSoftware_VTM/-/merge_requests/1821