Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#409 closed defect (fixed)
Wrong indent in semantic of sig_coeff_flag
| Reported by: | chhuanb | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | spec | Version: | VVC D6 vE |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@… |
Description
In semantic of sig_coeff_flag, "( xC & ( (1 << log2SbW ) − 1 ), yC & ( (1 << log2SbH ) − 1 ) ) is equal to ( 0, 0 )" should be aligned with "inferSbDcSigCoeffFlag is equal to 1"
Correction:
When sig_coeff_flag[ xC ][ yC ] is not present, it is inferred as follows:
– If ( xC, yC ) is the last significant location ( LastSignificantCoeffX, LastSignificantCoeffY ) in scan order or all of the following conditions are true, sig_coeff_flag[ xC ][ yC ] is inferred to be equal to 1:
– ( xC & ( (1 << log2SbW ) − 1 ), yC & ( (1 << log2SbH ) − 1 ) ) is equal to ( 0, 0 ).
– inferSbDcSigCoeffFlag is equal to 1.
– coded_sub_block_flag[ xS ][ yS ] is equal to 1.
– Otherwise, sig_coeff_flag[ xC ][ yC ] is inferred to be equal to 0.
Change history (1)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by bbross
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
This will be fixed in the next version of draft 7 (JVET-O2001-v7).