Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#421 closed defect (fixed)
Arguments for tu_cf_luma ctxInc derivation and misc
Reported by: | crosewarne | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | spec | Version: | VVC D6 vE |
Keywords: | Cc: | ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@… |
Description
One instance of the string 'trDepth' appears in the text, as input argument to '9.3.4.2.5 Derivation process of ctxInc for the syntax element tu_cbf_luma' and can be removed.
Arguments log2TbWidth alog2TbHeight are provided to this subclause but are not used.
In this subclause (and elsewhere), checking of BDPCM is via intra_bdpcm_flag but maybe should be via BdpcmFlag[ x ][ y ]. As general item, is it better to pass in a luma location for each context derivation and use this to access the (array) variable rather than directly referencing a decoded or inferred flag value. It happens for some context derivations but not others.
Change history (1)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by bbross
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Thanks for reporting.
This will be fixed JVET-P2001-v7.