Opened 3 months ago

Closed 9 days ago

#421 closed defect (fixed)

Arguments for tu_cf_luma ctxInc derivation and misc

Reported by: crosewarne Owned by:
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: spec Version: VVC D6 vE
Keywords: Cc: ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@…

Description

One instance of the string 'trDepth' appears in the text, as input argument to '9.3.4.2.5 Derivation process of ctxInc for the syntax element tu_cbf_luma' and can be removed.

Arguments log2TbWidth alog2TbHeight are provided to this subclause but are not used.

In this subclause (and elsewhere), checking of BDPCM is via intra_bdpcm_flag but maybe should be via BdpcmFlag[ x ][ y ]. As general item, is it better to pass in a luma location for each context derivation and use this to access the (array) variable rather than directly referencing a decoded or inferred flag value. It happens for some context derivations but not others.

Change history (1)

comment:1 Changed 9 days ago by bbross

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Thanks for reporting.

This will be fixed JVET-P2001-v7.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.