Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#1254 closed defect (fixed)
Subblock incorrectly called sub-block (8.5.6.5)
| Reported by: | fbossen | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | spec | Version: | VVC D10 vE |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@… |
Description
There seems to be a difference between a subblock and a sub-block, even though neither term is defined in section 3.
As far as I can tell, a sub-block specifically refers to a set of maximum 16 transform coefficients in a transform block.
In 8.5.6.5, the term "sub-block" is used towards the end. It should probably read "subblock" (as in the paragraph just above it).
Change history (1)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by jlchen
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Thanks for reporting the typo. Yes, it's also my understanding that a sub-block specifically refers to a set of maximum 16 transform coefficients in a transform block.
Will be fixed in JVET-S2001-vF release.