Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#532 closed defect (fixed)
Mismatch in equation 8-640 and 8-641 with SW
| Reported by: | chhuanb | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | spec | Version: | VVC D7 vD |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ksuehring, bbross, XiangLi, fbossen, jvet@… |
Description
Equation 8-640 and 8-641 are not aligned with SW.
Change from:
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 0 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] << 7 ) +
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 1 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] ) (8 640)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbHeight / cbWidth ) ) )
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 1 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] << 7 ) +
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 0 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] ) (8 641)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbHeight / cbWidth ) ) )
To:
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 0 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] << 7 ) +
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 1 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] ) (8 640)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbWidth / cbHeight ) ) )
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 1 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] << 7 ) -
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 0 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] ) (8 641)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbWidth / cbHeight ) ) )
Change history (6)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by zhou
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by bbross
- Version changed from VVC D6 vE to VVC D7 vC
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by bbross
How is this solved in VTM if a smaller size is divided by a larger one?
Is it really using floating point arithmetic and calculating Log2 on top of that?
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by bbross
- Version changed from VVC D7 vC to VVC D7 vD
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by chhuanb
VTM is implemented as:
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 0 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] << 7 ) +
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 1 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] ) (8 640)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbWidth ) - Log2( cbHeight ) ) )
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 1 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] << 7 ) -
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 0 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] ) (8 641)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbWidth ) - Log2( cbHeight ) ) )
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by bbross
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Thanks! That makes sense and will be fixed in the next version of the draft.
This may still not be right.
In the spec, "/" operation is defined as:
/ Integer division with truncation of the result toward zero. For example, 7 / 4 and −7 / −4 are truncated to 1 and −7 / 4 and 7 / −4 are truncated to −1.
Therefore, cbWidth / cbHeight could become zero if cbHeight > cbWidth.
"/" should be replaced by "÷" or ""-", or something like
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 0 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] << 7 ) +
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 1 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] ) (8 640)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbWidth ) - Log2( cbHeight ) ) )
cpMvLXCorner[ 1 ][ 1 ] = ( cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 1 ] << 7 ) -
( ( cpMvLXCorner[ 2 ][ 0 ] − cpMvLXCorner[ 0 ][ 0 ] ) (8 641)
<< ( 7 + Log2( cbWidth ) - Log2( cbHeight ) ) )
There might be several places like this in the spec.